[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

PACKAGE rebound by debugger

To: barmar@THINK.COM, SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com
Subject: *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
From: Scott McKay <SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 88 09:11:00 EDT
Cc: Stever@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com, symbolics-ext@THINK.COM, slug@WARBUCKS.AI.SRI.COM, Bug-Debugger@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com
Character-type-mappings: (1 0 (NIL 0) (NIL :BOLD NIL) "CPTFONTCB")
Fonts: CPTFONT, CPTFONTCB
In-reply-to: <19880527232136.5.BARMAR@OCCAM.THINK.COM>

    Date: Fri, 27 May 88 19:21 EDT
    From:     barmar@Think.COM (Barry Margolin)

	Date: Fri, 27 May 88 18:54 EDT
	From: Scott McKay <SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com>

	All you, and probably Barmar too, are arguing for is having 1in-package
0	behave like 1pkg-goto0.  I see nothing wrong with that.

    That would be fine with us.

I will include this in the first round of ECO patches, if I can.

References:
- *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
  - From: Barry Margolin <barmar@THINK.COM>

Prev by Date: *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
Next by Date: Software ECO tape
Previous by thread: *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
Next by thread: *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

*PACKAGE* rebound by debugger

PACKAGE rebound by debugger