[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

PACKAGE rebound by debugger

To: Scott McKay <SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com>
Subject: *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
From: Barry Margolin <barmar@THINK.COM>
Date: Fri, 27 May 88 18:01:00 EDT
Cc: Stever@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com, symbolics-ext@THINK.COM, slug@WARBUCKS.AI.SRI.COM, Bug-Debugger@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com
Character-type-mappings: (1 0 (NIL 0) (NIL :BOLD NIL) "CPTFONTCB")
Fonts: CPTFONT, CPTFONTCB
In-reply-to: <19880527225419.0.SWM@EVENING-GROSBEAK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

    Date: Fri, 27 May 88 18:54 EDT
    From: Scott McKay <SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com>

    All you, and probably Barmar too, are arguing for is having 1in-package
0    behave like 1pkg-goto0.  I see nothing wrong with that.

That would be fine with us.

                                                barmar

Follow-Ups:
- *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
  - From: "Scott W. Layson" <gyro@KESTREL.ARPA>
- *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
  - From: Scott McKay <SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com>

References:
- *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
  - From: Scott McKay <SWM@sapsucker.scrc.symbolics.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Continual Backups?
Next by Date: RE:EQ
Previous by thread: *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
Next by thread: *PACKAGE* rebound by debugger
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

*PACKAGE* rebound by debugger

PACKAGE rebound by debugger