[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: G206 and G208

To: "Charles R. Fry" <Chucko%vermithrax.sch.symbolics.com@RELAY.CS.NET>
Subject: Re: G206 and G208
From: Brad Miller <miller@CS.ROCHESTER.EDU>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 89 13:16:00 EDT
Cc: Paul Pangaro <pan%athena.pangaro.dialnet.symbolics.com@RELAY.CS.NET>, slug@WARBUCKS.AI.SRI.COM
Default-character-style: (:FIX :CONDENSED :NORMAL)
Fonts: CPTFONTC
In-reply-to: <19890920154411.7.CHUCKO@EUREKA.SCH.Symbolics.COM>
Organization: University of Rochester, Department of Computer Science
Phone: 716-275-1118
Postal-address: 610 CS Building, Comp Sci Dept., U. Rochester, Rochester NY 14627
Reply-to: miller@CS.ROCHESTER.EDU
Sender: miller@CS.ROCHESTER.EDU

    Date: Wed, 20 Sep 89 08:44 PDT
    From: Chucko@VERMITHRAX.SCH.Symbolics.COM (Charles R. Fry)

    There are no operational
    differences, so there is no need to update machines that have G206, unless you
    are retrofitting an ESDI drive to an older machine.

We've got both: I thought 208 added "autoboot" which is pretty useful for
servers (not that our server is a G machine :-).

References:
- G206 and G208
  - From: "Charles R. Fry" <Chucko%vermithrax.sch.symbolics.com@RELAY.CS.NET>

Prev by Date: 7.4 Zmacs Query
Next by Date: G206 and G208
Previous by thread: G206 and G208
Next by thread: G206 and G208
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread