[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
UX400S: a decent machine
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 90 09:24 PST
From: Mr. Spock <Spock@SAMSON.cadr.dialnet.symbolics.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 90 14:01 CST
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Donald H. Mitchell)
Some of the initial tie-ups were Sun host compatibility. Sure,
Symbolics chose the weird path of only authorizing file servers as
hosts. But I have mine working well in a 4/110.
This all sounds very good. How's your Sun configured? And, what's the
price tag all together (i.e. Sun + UX400S = ?)?
Sun 4/110, 16 MBytes memory (although since the Ivory does not use its
host's memory, I think this is irrelevant), 300 MByte SCSI drive. I
don't remember all the prices. I did not buy the Sun to act as the
Symbolics host but to use as a Sun. I think the Sun is about $15K, the
drive is whatever drives cost, and the Symbolics about $20K.
I have verified that for day-to-day tasks, you do not need a local tape
(will use any accessible Unix host's through remote exec calls);
however, you MAY need a local tape to get the thing initially set up
(including re-setting it up if the local drive fails). I don't know.
There is also some evidence that you may not need the local disk, or, at
least, that you could use a substantially smaller disk (and page over
You DO, however, need some accessible host with disk space :-)
Many products come built in: NFS, TCP/IP, and X. These all work
substantially better than their counterparts in 7.2.
Now this is encouraging. I've been more than mildly disappointed with X
Yes, X is very good. I haven't had any problems. Remember, the
Symbolics does not own its own terminal and must use X (for this reason,
the Symbolics cannot be the X side that displays?).
One of my minor beefs about NFS and TCP/IP is that the Symbolics can't
read or request the info from a Unix nameserver but has to have a
Symbolics style namespace available. Of course, I may have missed
Thanks for speaking up.