[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

problem with secure subnets attribute?

To: Juergen Christoffel <J.Christoffel@gmd.de>
Subject: problem with secure subnets attribute?
From: Barry Margolin <barmar@Think.COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 10:50:00 -0400
Cc: gooch@tijeras.sw-sw.dialnet.symbolics.com, drstrip@isrc.sandia.gov, slug@ai.sri.com
In-reply-to: <199208180921.AA10568@gmdzi.gmd.de>

    Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 05:21 EDT
    From: Juergen Christoffel <J.Christoffel@gmd.de>

    I'd be happy to agree that *enforcing* such a convention in a router
    isn't the best thing to do.

Given the relative rarity of Chaosnet, I always thought it was pretty
amazing that cisco put Chaos routing in their system at all.  I guess
you should take what you get...

                                                barmar

Follow-Ups:
- problem with secure subnets attribute?
  - From: <@IU.AI.SRI.COM:slug-admin@iu.ai.sri.com>

References:
- problem with secure subnets attribute?
  - From: Juergen Christoffel <J.Christoffel@gmd.de>

Prev by Date: problem with secure subnets attribute?
Next by Date: problem with secure subnets attribute?
Previous by thread: problem with secure subnets attribute?
Next by thread: problem with secure subnets attribute?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread