[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: numbers
Both Symbolics and Apollo have new machines in the works. There is an
instruction pre-fetch unit which may speed up 3600s 20% to 50%. There are
semi-custom VLSI things in the works also. But even if the Tern can catch up
in speed with the 3600, the 3600 has a 27 bit cons cell address space, as
compared to 19 bits in the 68010, and 22 AT BEST IFF they pin out the existant
address lines in the 68020. (am I wrong here? Could the 68000 architecture
support 32 bits of byte address, and thus 27 or 28 bits of cons cells???)
On an Apollo which uses either 68000 or 68010, a user process can have
24 bit address space which is 16Mbytes. If anyone would like to
verify the information, please see
Leach, Paul J., et al,
"The Architecture of an Integrated Local Network,"
Submitted to IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications,
Nov 1983.
If we really look for a large address space, then VAX VMS supports 32 bit
address space, though user program can actually use 30 bits. The new
chip MicroVax-II benchmarks show that its speed is as fast as a 780,
depending on what you are doing. In case anyone is interested and
has seen it, I forward the benchmark message. "Ultrix-32m" is a fixed
version of Unix 4.2 maintained by DEC.
------- Forwarded Message
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 84 20:02:08 edt
To: baskett@decwrl, sysV, upo
Subject: MicroVAX-II and Ultrix-32m
Ultrix-32m ran on the MicroVAX-II prototype in Hudson today at
4:30pm (8-23-84) on it's second boot attempt.
People, it feels like a 780 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The following benchmark (obtained from Forest Baskett) was compiled
and run on THE machine. The SAME kernel and benchmark was also booted on one of
the UEG MicroVAX-I's in Merrimack later in the evening. The executable image
was then run (without recompiling) on a UEG VAX780 and VAX750.
780 750 uVAX-I uVAX-II
----------------------------------------------------------------------
perm 2480 4200 7460 2310
towers 2460 4420 8070 2390
queens 1010 1630 3010 1000
intmm 2250 4030 6650 3090
mm 2850 4810 8990 109420
puzzle 12140 22500 38270 12170
quick 1210 1990 3940 1290
bubble 1600 3150 6170 1770
tree 2920 4580 8560 2780
fft 4380 7830 16530 206170
The mm and fft are floating point intensive which explains the deviation.
What will it be like when we get the FPU chip in the board ??????????????
Ray Lanza
------- End of Forwarded Message
-------