[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MUMBLEF
- To: LEBRUN at PARC-MAXC, bug-lispm at MIT-AI
- Subject: MUMBLEF
- From: Daniel L. Weinreb <dlw at SCRC-TENEX>
- Date: Wed ,20 Jan 82 13:53:00 EDT
deletef and renamef are supposedly there for Maclisp compatibility;
people may be propagating this naming convention because it is there.
The right names, according to our conventions, are probably
delete-file and rename-file. However, do we make an incompatible change,
removing the Maclisp-compatible function? Or should we leave in the ones
that Maclisp has but introduce new names and have both versions for those
operations that Maclisp supports?