[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: PROCLAIM-SCOPE (Version 1)
- To: Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM
- Subject: Issue: PROCLAIM-SCOPE (Version 1)
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 88 14:45 EDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: <19880908025215.0.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 88 22:52 EDT
From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
This is too complicated for me. I think it's better to do nothing
until/unless the compiler committee comes up with a better framework
in which to deal with this.
This is a reasonable position. Fyi, I do not plan to push this issue
unless someone else gets on the bandwagon with me. I did think it
important to raise it, though, and I think it should at least be one
of the items mentioned in the new manual's list of "things that should
be expected to vary between implementations".