[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Fyi, the following discussion recently took place on CL-Cleanup...

 Date: 17 Sep 88 15:15 PDT
 From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
 To:   CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
 I think this is a moderately useful issue to be resolved if the compiler
 committee hasn't done so. I'm not on cl-compiler so I don't know what, if any,
 progress has been made on the numerous issues that were deferred to them. Was
 this one of them?
 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 88 19:21 EDT
 From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
 To:   CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU

 The CL-Compiler committee has been actively discussing this, so I think
 we can safely ignore it for the time being.

 If they fail to reach closure and submit something to X3J13 in a timely
 fashion, I will take care of reviving it here.
 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 88 16:30 PDT
 From: Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM
 To:   CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU

 Given the current X3J13 schedule, what does timely mean?  Is there
 reason to believe the compiler committee will arrive in Washington with
 a detailed proposal that they want the full committee to vote on?  If
 not, the cleanup committee should probably generate its own proposal