[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)

To: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu, maida@ibm.com
Subject: Re: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: 3 Feb 89 22:55 PST
In-reply-to: masinter.pa's message of 3 Feb 89 22:41 PST

One reason to send it out to X3J13 is to arbitrate on our notes. I notice
that Moon's notes say "Accepted with amendment that CLOSE of a closed
stream returns NIL".

Mary (or anyone else): do you have a record of the amendment & vote on
issue CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS?

Follow-Ups:
- Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
  - From: Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
- Re: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
  - From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Prev by Date: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
Next by Date: Issue: CLOS-CONDITIONS (Version 3)
Previous by thread: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
Next by thread: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread