[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
- To: masinter.pa@xerox.com
- Subject: Issue: CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS (Version 6)
- From: Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 89 11:45:54 EST
- Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu, maida@ibm.com
- In-reply-to: masinter.pa@xerox.com's message of 3 Feb 89 22:55 PST <890203-225602-2835@Xerox>
Date: 3 Feb 89 22:55 PST
From: masinter.pa@xerox.com
One reason to send it out to X3J13 is to arbitrate on our notes. I notice
that Moon's notes say "Accepted with amendment that CLOSE of a closed
stream returns NIL".
Mary (or anyone else): do you have a record of the amendment & vote on
issue CLOSED-STREAM-OPERATIONS?
For what it is worth, my notes say "amended that CLOSE of a closed
stream return NIL."
--Guy