[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: DESTRUCTURING-BIND (Version 2)
- To: Moon@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com
- Subject: Issue: DESTRUCTURING-BIND (Version 2)
- From: Guy Steele <gls@Think.COM>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 89 11:40:11 EST
- Cc: KMP@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com, CL-Cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
- In-reply-to: David A. Moon's message of Fri, 3 Feb 89 18:11 EST <19890203231131.9.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 89 18:11 EST
From: David A. Moon <Moon@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com>
...
In fact the feature that I really prefer is the one that provides an
automatic DECLARE IGNORE for any variable that is named IGNORE and is
not referenced. For some reason I was hesitant to suggest that; I think
I was being stupid.
Presumably you want the additional special treatment that such
variables named IGNORE are exempt from the prohibition on the same
variable appearing twice in a lambda-list.
--Guy