[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue SAFE-CODE, version 1
- To: Dick Gabriel <RPG@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>, masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Issue SAFE-CODE, version 1
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 89 16:53 EST
- Cc: cl-compiler@SAIL.Stanford.EDU, x3j13@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: <svXEG@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>, <890316-070317-3708@Xerox>, <1avs40@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>, <19890314214907.7.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Line-fold: No
Either "nonsafe code" or "code not declared safe" has better connotations
for me than "unsafe code." I don't really want to get too deeply involved
in choosing the terminology here (if I did, I would be on the editorial
committee), I only wanted to point out that the word used in version 1
of the proposal had an unwanted connotation for me.