Re: Nested accepting-values

• To: York@lucid.com
• Subject: Re: Nested accepting-values
• From: Jeff Close <jclose@chesapeake.ads.com>
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 18:12:41 EDT
• Cc: clim@BBN.COM
• In-Reply-To: Bill York's message of Tue, 18 Aug 92 10:54:44 PDT <9208181754.AA03298@oakland-hills.lucid>
• Reply-To: jclose@ads.com

   Do you really mean nested ACCEPTING-VALUES calls, or nested calls to
   ACCEPT?  For example, do you have a presentation type parser that
   calls ACCEPT recursively on another type?  If so, you should probably
   use WITH-ACTIVATION-CHARACTERS (with the :OVERRIDE option) around the
   inner call to ACCEPT to remove Newline and/or Return from the
   activation list.  You then may also have to use WITH-BLIP-CHARACTERS
   to add Newline back as a delimiter.
   ...
Bill,

Thanks for the response.  What I need is the best way to define an
accept for a structure (instance) with several fields, then use that
accept within another similar accept call.  E.g.:

Accept for type X includes several accept calls -- need those be
sequential accepts within the accept method for X, could they be in an
accepting-values?  -- anyways, I then want to define an accept for
type Y that includes multiple accepts of type X.  Is this specific
enough?  If not, I'll send you some code.

Jeffrey

• Nested accepting-values
• From: Bill York <york%oakland-hills@lucid.com>

• Nested accepting-values
• From: Bill York <york%oakland-hills@lucid.com>

• Prev: Nested accepting-values
• Next: Problem to print from one application into other applications
• Index: CLIM Mailing list (1-Jan-92 to 31-Aug-92)
• Thread: CLIM Mailing list Index (1-Jan-92 to 31-Aug-92)