[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: type real



>      Sorry about being overly terse (my habitual sin...)
>      I *know* about (declare (type whatever)).
>      My point is that according to CLtL2, (declare (real ...)) *should* 
>      work, that's it.

The type REAL is a CLtL2 addition;  Clisp does not implement all of CLtL2.

P.