[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: type real
- To: <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: type real
- From: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 97 11:00:58 -0500
- Return-receipt-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sorry about being overly terse (my habitual sin...)
> I *know* about (declare (type whatever)).
> My point is that according to CLtL2, (declare (real ...)) *should*
> work, that's it.
The type REAL is a CLtL2 addition; Clisp does not implement all of CLtL2.
Isn't it the shining goal to be ANSI compliant?
(except for the ~/function/ heresy, of course :-)