[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[4]: type real
- To: <clisp-list@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de>, <clisp-list@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Subject: Re[4]: type real
- From: sshteingold@cctrading.com
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 97 11:00:58 -0500
- Return-receipt-to: <sshteingold@cctrading.com>
> Sorry about being overly terse (my habitual sin...)
> I *know* about (declare (type whatever)).
> My point is that according to CLtL2, (declare (real ...)) *should*
> work, that's it.
The type REAL is a CLtL2 addition; Clisp does not implement all of CLtL2.
... Yet.
Isn't it the shining goal to be ANSI compliant?
(except for the ~/function/ heresy, of course :-)