[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: type real
- To: <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: type real
- From: Bruno Haible <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 21:32:14 +0200 (MET DST)
- >received: from halles.ilog.fr (halles.ilog.fr [172.16.1.96]) by ilog.ilog.fr (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA22706; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 21:32:16 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: <199709161425.QAA15759@helen.cli.di.unipi.it>
- References: <199709161425.QAA15759@helen.cli.di.unipi.it>
Sam Shteingold <email@example.com> wrote:
> > My point is that according to CLtL2, (declare (real ...)) *should*
> > work, that's it.
Pierpaolo Bernardi <bernardp@CLI.DI.Unipi.IT> replied:
> The type REAL is a CLtL2 addition; Clisp does not implement all of CLtL2.
Actually, the type REAL was in CLISP before I ever saw CLtL2, because
it was a very natural addition. The fact that X3J13 issue <151> influences
table 4-1 and hence the list of valid declarations just slipped through
my eyes. That will be corrected.