[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Upgrading to MCL 2.0?
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Upgrading to MCL 2.0?
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Bill McDonald)
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 93 21:32:56 PST
> From email@example.com Sat Dec 25 23:57:47 1993
> Received: from fcca.fcca.csi.com (fcca-57) by cae780.fcca.csi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
> id AA23294; Sat, 25 Dec 93 23:57:46 PST
> Received: from relay2.UU.NET by fcca.fcca.csi.com (8.5/2.7davy)
> id XAA14962; Sat, 25 Dec 1993 23:56:50 -0800
> Received: from brazil.cambridge.apple.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP
> (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA22115; Sun, 26 Dec 93 02:57:15 -0500
> Received: from ministry.cambridge.apple.com by brazil.cambridge.apple.com with SMTP (5.64/25-eef)
> id AA08190; Sun, 26 Dec 93 02:47:10 -0500
> for jwt%proact@uunet.UU.NET
> Received: by cambridge.apple.com (5.64/25-eef)
> id AA05802; Sun, 26 Dec 93 02:49:50 -0500
> Received: from brazil.cambridge.apple.com by cambridge.apple.com with SMTP (5.64/25-eef)
> id AA05798; Sun, 26 Dec 93 02:49:46 -0500
> Received: from amiserv.xnet.com by brazil.cambridge.apple.com with SMTP (5.64/25-eef)
> id AA08170; Sun, 26 Dec 93 02:45:21 -0500
> for firstname.lastname@example.org
> Received: from <gagme.wwa.com> by amiserv.xnet.com with bsmtp
> (Smail184.108.40.206 #1) id m0pDqDs-000wuCC; Sun, 26 Dec 93 01:49 CST
> Received: from mtlookitthat.chi.il.us by gagme.wwa.com with uucp
> (Smail220.127.116.11 #1) id m0pDmcm-0004ERC; Sat, 25 Dec 93 21:58 CST
> Received: by mtlookitthat.chi.il.us (FernMail); Sat, 25 Dec 93 19:12:23
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Upgrading to MCL 2.0?
> References: <9312232000.AA22734@cambridge.apple.com>
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Chris Hanson)
> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 93 19:12:23 CDT
> Message-Id: <email@example.com>
> X-Mailer: Fernmail 1.1 (unregistered, shareware fee not paid)
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 1992
> Status: RO
> In message <9312232000.AA22734@cambridge.apple.com>,
> <9312232000.AA22734@cambridge.apple.com> writes:
> > >To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > >Date: Sun, 19 Dec 93 10:00:59 EST
> > >Subject: Upgrading to MCL 2.0?
> > >
> > >I am considering upgrading from Allegro CL 1.2.2 to MCL 2.x. Before
> > >deciding, I would like to know the difference between upgrading and
> > >purchasing the complete package. Can someone tell me exactly what is
> > >included in the upgrade package, and what additional material is included in
> > >the complete package? I spoke to APDA, but received a vague answer. Also
> > >can anyone tell me whether it is even feasible to upgrade from the pre-Apple
> > >version 1.2.2?
> > The upgrade from 1.x.x to 2.x is no longer available (and hasn't been for
> > a number of years). There is currently an upgrade from 2.0 to 2.0.1
> > available, but this wouldn't leave you with a complete documentation.
> > So, you'll need to order the whole package.
> > -Andrew Shalit
> Then why does my new APDA catalog, which came about two days ago, list
> 'Macintosh Common Lisp v.2.0.1 Update (B0753LL/B, $200) with a note
> underneath saying
> > Macintosh Common Lisp 2.01 Update is available to customers who have
> > previously purchased MCL v.1.3.2, **Macintosh Allegro Common Lisp**
> > [emphasis added], or Coral Common Lisp. This update includes three
> > Macintosh disks, a CD-ROM disc, and two manuals. It does not include
> > _Common Lisp: The Language_. To update from 2.0 to 2.0.1, please
> > contact APDA.
> I would assume that this means he can upgrade for $200, and get
> everything but CLtL (since the regular MCL 2.0.1 product has 3
> floppies, 1 CD, and two manuals listed as its contents).
> Just wondering.
> Remember: Puck lives * Puck saves * Puck loves
> Puck the Plastic Duck loves everyone, even you.
> Chris Hanson, KSC -- Friend of Puck, member Puck Foundation
> email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
> email@example.com Fnord!
I tried call on this too but ADPA quoted me $500!!!
I have the Mac Allegro CL v1.3.. I really don't
think that ADPA is serving us all that well.
Lets hope next year is better for one and all.