[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CHPROP problems
- To: RWK at MIT-MC
- Subject: Re: CHPROP problems
- From: Daniel L. Weinreb <DLW at MIT-AI>
- Date: Mon ,18 Aug 80 04:17:00 EDT
- Cc: LISP-FORUM at MIT-MC
Well, do you also object to PLUS, on the grounds that you want to know
whether fixnums, flonums, or bignums are being compared? Do you want
to ahve a floating point version of >? Some people like generic
functions. In this case, I think it is a matter of taste. If
necessary, to make everyone happy, we could define that < must work on
characters, but that CHAR< exists as an alternate name; I'd prefer not
to do this, though, as it is rather inelegant.