[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- To: GJC at MIT-MC
- From: Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
- Date: Thu ,15 Jan 81 19:54:00 EDT
- Cc: LISP-FORUM at MIT-MC
Ah, but the problem is that you can't return non-symbols and get the right
thing to happen. Things need to be more regularly defined I think. Having
((...) ...) work as an implicit-funcall in random places is a real crock
and the compiler will give you a 'rewriting with FUNCALL' message when it
happens, so i doubt people really use it. Making ((...) ...) have a well-
defined semantics would be a nice thing to see.