[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quick question about lexically scoped defun...
All the complexity in that function is to be able to ask an intelligent
question. If you don't want the question asked, replace it with:
(DEFUN ENCLOSE-TOP-LEVEL (LAMBDA ENV NAME)
I agree that there should be a parameter to control this.
I had a function that was defined in a non null lexical environment.
I first compiled it and got the apropriate warning to which I
answered Yes. I then made the above change to ENCLOSE-TOP-LEVEL
and recompiled the function. I got this compiler warning:
Compiling DEFINE-CLAUSE-SET SIMPLE-EXAMPLE
For Function SIMPLE-EXAMPLE-2
Function SIMPLE-EXAMPLE-2 is being redefined with an unsafeguarded definition.
Its previous definition was safeguarded.
What does this mean? Will non-null lexical environments work now?