Re: Quick question about lexically scoped defun...

[Siskind.pa@XEROX.COM]

    All the complexity in that function is to be able to ask an intelligent
    question.  If you don't want the question asked, replace it with:

    (DEFUN ENCLOSE-TOP-LEVEL (LAMBDA ENV NAME)
      ENV)

    I agree that there should be a parameter to control this.

I had a function that was defined in a non null lexical environment.
I first compiled it and got the apropriate warning to which I
answered Yes. I then made the above change to ENCLOSE-TOP-LEVEL
and recompiled the function. I got this compiler warning:

Compiling DEFINE-CLAUSE-SET SIMPLE-EXAMPLE
For Function SIMPLE-EXAMPLE-2
  Function SIMPLE-EXAMPLE-2 is being redefined with an unsafeguarded definition.
  Its previous definition was safeguarded.

What does this mean? Will non-null lexical environments work now?
        Jeff
-------