[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: transfer from explorer to Symbolics

To: Doug Evans <DE%phoenix.sch.symbolics.com@RELAY.CS.NET>
Subject: Re: transfer from explorer to Symbolics
From: Mike Clarkson <mike%ists.ists.ca@WARBUCKS.AI.SRI.COM>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 89 16:13:23 EST
Cc: slug@WARBUCKS.AI.SRI.COM
In-reply-to: Message from "Doug Evans" of Mar 22, 89 at 1:51 pm

> To everyone else listening on SLUG, please note that there is no
> advantage to using QIC-11 or QIC-24 formats, other than for compatiblity
> purposes.  The different formats have nothing to do with density or tape
> capacity.
>      

I believe that QUIC-24 has both higher density and more error checking.

Mike.

--
Mike Clarkson					mike@ists.UUCP
Institute for Space and Terrestrial Science	mike@ists.ists.ca
York University, North York, Ontario,		uunet!mnetor!yunexus!ists!mike
CANADA M3J 1P3					+1 (416) 736-5611

Follow-Ups:
- Re: transfer from explorer to Symbolics
  - From: Reti@SCRC-RIVERSIDE.ARPA
- Re: transfer from explorer to Symbolics
  - From: Doug Evans <DE%phoenix.sch.symbolics.com@RELAY.CS.NET>

Prev by Date: A question
Next by Date: A question
Previous by thread: Re: transfer from Explorer to Symbolics
Next by thread: Re: transfer from explorer to Symbolics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread