[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

performance with >> 9 MW of memory

To: slug%ai.sri.com@slug-east.scrc.symbolics.com
Subject: performance with >> 9 MW of memory
From: pan@ATHENA.PANGARO.dialnet.symbolics.com (Paul Pangaro)
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1991 14:42:00 -0500
Supersedes: <19911206181804.9.PAN@ATHENA.PANGARO.dialnet.symbolics.com>, <19911206182927.2.PAN@ATHENA.PANGARO.dialnet.symbolics.com>

I have heard second hand that performance of symbolics machines
(certainly this was about L machines, maybe G's too, that is part of the
question) "degrades" with more than 9 MW of memory. Anybody know
anything about this? I have no other info

Follow-Ups:
- performance with >> 9 MW of memory
  - From: SWM@SAPSUCKER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM (Scott McKay)

Prev by Date: horizontal shake in monitor image
Next by Date: performance with >> 9 MW of memory
Previous by thread: horizontal shake in monitor image
Next by thread: performance with >> 9 MW of memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread